the sherbrooke bride by catherine coulter

On a separate note the main characters are developed. I bought the second book before I listened to this one. The message she is not as pretty as her sister and other pretty girls was beat into the ground. I have read and listened to various very offensive topics and material however, the degradation by family, friends and strangers of the main character was not necessary to the story. If this book were a movie would you go see it? I have favorites I buy books because they are masters of narration. To qualify that statement, I am picky about narrators and feel some are good at some types of stories, accents and gender differences. I do think that other narrators could do it better. I suppose the constant disturbing parts were for psychological effect or something.ĭid the narration match the pace of the story? I was surprised I stuck with it after there were so many disturbing aspects to the story. What was your reaction to the ending? (No spoilers please!) Also, he repeatedly talks of her sisters beauty even after he is committed to his wife.The most effective, admirable and interesting character was Sinjin, the little sister of the offensive brute.

Once the character accepts and grows to admire and want to keep the woman as his wife, I find it hard to believe for a very long time period for him to repeatedly be so cruel towards her appearance when he obviously is fond of her. First I don't care the time period, I don't believe in anytime and any class it would be accepted on repeated occurrences for a group of six or more people to berate one sister in reference to another sister's beauty over and over. Is there anything you would change about this book? Misogynists & superficial-ism tucked in story

The sherbrooke bride by catherine coulter